About your Search

20130801
20130831
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
was driving, but, again, to -- >> how do they know? neil: you have to check the text, and nsa on the prowl. >> no, no, no, look, it makes sense in terms of tort law. were they to allow this if you couldn't know -- neil: you're a lawyer; right? >> i am. causation is a very real concept in tort law. liste from a practical point of view -- neil: how about big government creeps? now, not only to the driver, but anyone communicating with that driver. >> if they know the driver's driving? neil: how do you think they know? how do you think they will know? >> two ways. one way is -- neil: give us your phone. >> thanks a lot, don't want to hand over the phone. >> let me answer. one way is ed. we have that in situations. there's evidence. if there's no evidence, then you're not going to be spobl. evidence, and that comes out in the court. if they put you on the stand and you were the one texting, and they asked you the questions, saying, did you know that person was driving at the time you were texting to them? if you say, yes, then we know. the other way is a possibility. they may look at your pho
discussed it would have been buried. i believe he was in favor of what nsa was doing this operation -- >> you sayg he knew? >> i say i find it difficult to believe as an american citizen he did not a clue at extend of what they are doing, he is our coder in chief, he is in charge. iin my mind, how many committees e worth while? >> that is what i was thinking, commissions and their work pile up largely ignored. >> you are putting james clapper in charge of investigating james clapper, he is in charge of investigatng -- >> you find that odd? >> bizarre, and i watch that press conrence, it was a great defense of obamacare, but a horrible defense of this. because, you are right. no president wants toave another 9/11 on their watch. nobody. they will go to whatever measures they will go to to prevent it from happening, i think measures a way too extreme. i'm not comfortable them. i am opposed to it. it has gone wayyoverboard, so, my attitude is, don't have another commission, you know what you are doing, you don't need t to investigate it, clappr investigating clap ser really clper is re
don't sit back. fight back. apparently you need not be an open book, and therere ways around the nsa. who knew? i started getting all these e-mails from viewers to tell me we need not take this surveiling digital forensic analyst on how we give the fed defender. all perfectly legal. good to have you. i guess the key is just making sure that our accounts are not accessible. have you do that? >> two things. in the immediate term andong term. you have to recognize that the free and sheep service, these are not going to protect your privacy, everything you send on them and use them as an open book. so that you just need to accept. what you can do is use alternative messaging services. they do cost money, but they will increase your messages and data. i think it's important for two reasons. in the short term you protect the information, especially if your lawyer or a cow or a business person and keep the data private. neil: you are a genius. i am not. what does this mean? >> that protect the security of the law in of your mailbox. they offer this. they send the code to your phone. you als
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3